Every way in which I "win" involves, in some sense, an abandonment of the game, as we intuitively understand it. I can win only by giving a radical meaning to the word "win." I can hit my opponent over the head or I can falsify the records. Put another way, there is no "technical solution" to the problem. Consider the problem, "How can I win the game of tick-tack-toe?" It is well known that I cannot, if I assume (in keeping with the conventions of game theory) that my opponent understands the game perfectly. It is easy to show that the class is not a null class. Rather, the concern here is with the important concept of a class of human problems which can be called "no technical solution problems," and more specifically, with the identification and discussion of one of these. They cautiously qualified their statement with the phrase, "It is our considered professional judgment…." Whether they were right or not is not the concern of the present article. Wiesner and York exhibited this courage publishing in a science journal, they insisted that the solution to the problem was not to be found in the natural sciences. Because of previous failures in prophecy, it takes courage to assert that a desired technical solution is not possible. In our day (though not in earlier times) technical solutions are always welcome. A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.
An implicit and almost universal assumption of discussions published in professional and semipopular scientific journals is that the problem under discussion has a technical solution. I would like to focus your attention not on the subject of the article (national security in a nuclear world) but on the kind of conclusion they reached, namely that there is no technical solution to the problem.
It is our considered professional judgment that this dilemma has no technical solution. If the great powers continue to look for solutions in the area of science and technology only, the result will be to worsen the situation.'' York concluded that: "Both sides in the arms race are…confronted by the dilemma of steadily increasing military power and steadily decreasing national security.
"The Tragedy of the Commons," Garrett Hardin, Science, 162(1968):1243-1248.Īt the end of a thoughtful article on the future of nuclear war, J.B.
0 kommentar(er)
